Mental Health for All report

Community findings on care, stigma, access, and trust.

This summary highlights coalition findings from multilingual surveys, focus groups, interviews, and community engagement with Slavic and Eastern European communities. The report should be read as a foundation for deeper engagement rather than a definitive community-wide study.

Key findings

The strongest signal is not lack of need. It is lack of culturally trusted access.

01

Informal support carries much of the load.

Participants commonly turn to family, friends, churches, meditation, self-help, and providers abroad. These supports are valuable, but they can leave people without professional help when stress comes from the same close networks.

02

Language and cultural alignment shape trust.

LCSNW participants showed an overwhelming preference for providers who speak their language and understand Slavic and Eastern European experiences, including trauma, migration, and post-Soviet stigma.

03

Insurance knowledge does not automatically become care.

More than half of insured respondents reported at least partial understanding of coverage, yet 70% of participants with listed insurance had never used mental health services in the U.S. or in their home countries.

04

Stigma remains generational and gendered.

The report identifies stereotypes around weakness, instability, religious concerns, and "real men do not cry" expectations as barriers that can reduce help-seeking.

What the numbers show

Coverage, service use, and language preference do not move together.

Insurance understanding vs. service use

OHP understand coverage
58%
Other insurance understand coverage
67%
Insured participants never used services
70%

Coverage literacy is necessary, but the report suggests stigma, language access, trust, and system navigation still prevent care utilization.

Provider fit matters

97% prefer provider language match
76% prefer individual therapy
77% associate services with stigma

IRCO: gaps community members want fixed

25% 22% 20% 18% 15%
Culturally and linguistically appropriate care Access and affordability Stigma, education, and awareness System improvements Alternative and self-directed care

Agency findings

Each partner surfaced a different part of the access problem.

LCSNW

Collected 106 survey responses, 10 focus groups, and 8 interviews. Participants reported strong preference for individual therapy and providers who speak Russian or Ukrainian, while also identifying stigma and interpreter concerns.

70% use non-professional ways to care for mental health.

SCC of NW

Gathered feedback from 104 immigrants and refugees across nine countries. Findings emphasized language barriers, long waits for care, medication concerns, faith-community trust, and the need for navigators.

Community members requested culturally specific navigation.

IRCO

Received 159 responses in six languages. Most participants rated their well-being positively, but those who reported barriers cited time, language, and cultural sensitivity.

42.3% chose individual therapy as the most effective service.

SOSS

Focused on domestic violence prevention, consent, non-violent communication, safety, and mental health education. Stigma around sexuality, consent, abuse, and mental health remained a barrier to attendance.

40% cited shame as a reason for limited sexual health knowledge.

Coalition-wide patterns

Migration history affects insurance, status, and support needs.

The aggregate findings point to two large arrival patterns: established immigrants who arrived before or during 2013, and recent arrivals connected to 2022 migration. The report notes that future work should deepen analysis across age, gender, country of origin, and immigration history.

60% arrived in or before 2013, or in 2022 alone
40% were Ukrainians who arrived in 2022 or 2023
70% of pre-2014 arrivals became U.S. citizens
82% of valid responses came from six countries

Strategic priorities

What the report points toward next.

Train providers and interpreters

Expand cultural-awareness training for clinicians and mental-health-specific training for interpreters so care is accurate, confidential, and trauma-informed.

Build navigation into trusted settings

Place navigators in community organizations and clinics to explain insurance, billing, referrals, emergency care, and appointment scheduling.

Normalize care through community channels

Continue multilingual education, provider panels, faith-community engagement, support groups, and short-term topic-specific groups in Russian and Ukrainian.

Conclusion

COSEEO is using these findings to move from awareness to action.

The coalition continues to meet bi-weekly, seek funding, offer community support groups, provide insurance guidance, connect families to mental health resources, convene culturally specific providers, and support the providers who carry their own trauma while serving the community.

Open full PDF